by Peter Phillips, Published on Thursday, February 9, 2006 by CommonDreams.org
The leadership
class in the US is now dominated by a neo-conservative group of some
200 people who have the shared goal of asserting US military power
worldwide. This Global Dominance Group, in cooperation with major
military contractors, has become a powerful force in military
unilateralism and US political processes.
A
long thread of sociological research documents the existence of a
dominant ruling class in the US, which sets policy and determines
national political priorities. C. Wright Mills, in his 1956 book on the
power elite, documented how World War II solidified a trinity of power
in the US that comprised corporate, military, and government elites in
a centralized power structure working in unison through “higher
circles” of contact and agreement.
Neo-conservatives
promoting the US Military control of the world are now in dominant
policy positions within these higher circles of the US. Adbusters
magazine summed up neo-conservatism as: “The belief that Democracy,
however flawed, was best defended by an ignorant public pumped on
nationalism and religion. Only a militantly nationalist state could
deter human aggression. Such nationalism requires an external threat
and if one cannot be found it must be manufactured.”
In
1992, during Bush the First’s administration, Dick Cheney supported
Lewis Libby and Paul Wolfowitz in producing the “Defense Planning
Guidance” report, which advocated US military dominance around the
globe in a “new order.” The report called for the United States to grow
in military superiority and to prevent new rivals from rising up to
challenge us on the world stage.
At
the end of Clinton’s administration, global dominance advocates founded
the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Among the PNAC founders
were eight people affiliated with the number-one defense contractor
Lockheed-Martin, and seven others associated with the number-three
defense contractor Northrop Grumman. Of the twenty-five founders of
PNAC twelve were later appointed to high level positions in the George
W. Bush administration.
In
September 2000, PNAC produced a 76-page report entitled Rebuilding
America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.
The report, similar to the 1992 Defense Policy Guidance report, called
for the protection of the American Homeland, the ability to wage
simultaneous theater wars, perform global constabulary roles, and the
control of space and cyberspace. It claimed that the 1990s were a
decade of defense neglect and that the US must increase military
spending to preserve American geopolitical leadership as the world’s
superpower. The report also recognized that: “the process of
transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and
catalyzing event such as a new Pearl Harbor.” The events of September
11, 2001 presented exactly the catastrophe that the authors of
Rebuilding America’s Defenses theorized were needed to accelerate a
global dominance agenda. The resulting permanent war on terror has led
to massive government defense spending, the invasions of two countries,
and the threatening of three others, and the rapid acceleration of the
neo-conservative plans for military control of the world.
The
US now spends as much for defense as the rest of the world combined.
The Pentagon’s budget for buying new weapons rose from $61 billion in
2001 to over $80 billion in 2004. Lockheed Martin’s sales rose by over
30% at the same time, with tens of billions of dollars on the books for
future purchases. From 2000 to 2004, Lockheed Martin’s stock value rose
300%. Northrup-Grumann saw similar growth with DoD contracts rising
from $3.2 billion in 2001 to $11.1 billion in 2004. Halliburton, with
Dick Cheney as former CEO, had defense contracts totaling $427 million
in 2001. By 2003, they had $4.3 billion in defense contracts, of which
approximately a third were sole source agreements.
At
the beginning of 2006 the Global Dominance Group’s agenda is well
established within higher circle policy councils and cunningly
operationalized inside the US Government. They work hand in hand with
defense contractors promoting deployment of US forces in over 700 bases
worldwide.
There
is an important difference between self-defense from external threats,
and the belief in the total military control of the world. When asked,
most working people in the US have serious doubts about the moral and
practical acceptability of financing world domination.
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and director of Project Censored,
a media research organization. A more in-depth review of the global
dominance group’s agenda and a list of the 200 advocates see: http://www.projectcensored.org/downloads/Global_Dominance_Group.pdf